4.6 Article

Hand motor activity, cognition, mood, and the rest-activity rhythm in dementia A clustered RCT

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 196, 期 2, 页码 271-278

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.012

关键词

Motor activity; Cognition; Mood; Rest-activity rhythm; Dementia; Nursing homes

资金

  1. Osiragroep Amsterdam and Alzheimer Nederland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Physical activity such as walking may exert a positive impact on cognition and behaviour in older persons with dementia, but due to the frailty of the population it may be worthwhile to consider other motor activities as well. Objective: Examining the effects of]land motor activity on cognition, mood and the rest-activity rhythm in older persons with dementia. Methods: Sixty-one older nursing home residents with dementia (mean age 84.6 years) were randomly assigned to either a hand movement program (experimental) or read aloud program (control) for 30 min, 5 days a week, during 6 weeks. Neuropsychological tests, mood questionnaires, and actigraphy data were assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks, and again after 6 weeks. Apolipoprotein epsilon (ApoE) genotype was determined. Results: Scores on neuropsychological tests were combined and formed specific Cognitive domains. Symptoms of depression and anxiety formed the Mood domain. Actigraphy variables composed the Rest-activity domain. In mixed model analyses no significant group x time interactions were found on either the Cognitive, Mood or Rest-activity domains in the intention-to-treat analysis. in the per protocol analysis, that included people who attended at least 80% of the sessions, mood improved only in the experimental group. No significant time x group x ApoE interaction effects were found in either analysis. Conclusion: In older nursing home residents with dementia, increased attendance to the hand movement program appeared to have a positive effect on mood. Hand motor activity is a type of activity that can be applied at a large scale. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据