Ethical issues and the importance of consensus for the intensive care team

This paper draws upon an empirical study and combines moral philosophical insights and sociological analysis to shed light on the ethical issues in intensive care. It is argued that moral philosophical debate often leaves aside the social context in which ethical decisions are taken and carried through. In order to gain an understanding of how intensive care is accomplished and specifically how ethical issues are handled, the study focused primarily on nurses' accounts of and views on the practices which form the everyday work of intensive care. A qualitative approach was adopted involving theoretical sampling and the constant comparative method of analysis. The paper argues that the most difficult ethical issue in intensive care, namely the withholding or withdrawal of treatment, is an area in which nursing and medical perspectives are often at odds. However, when the social context of clinical practice is taken into account, this paper argues, there is common ground between the two professions. It was found that the period during which the decision to withdraw treatment is being made, the members of the intensive care team closest to the bedside, nursing and medical staff, become impatient for some resolution of the situation. The differences of opinion which arise over the decision to withdraw are not simply to do with the way in which the situation is experienced by each professional group, proximity to the patient had a part to play in shaping their views rather than, as it is sometimes presumed, a simple rift between medicine and nursing. The data suggest that intensive care has to be a team effort. Even though there is no legal requirement for nurses to agree with the ICU decisions, there seems to be a strong desire within the intensive care team that moral consensus should be achieved in the interests of good patient care. Intensive care relies on the integrity of the team and the unfailing functioning of teamwork. Consequently, achieving this, it seems, is more important than other temporary lapses in interprofessional relations and disagreements over treatment in individual cases. Consensus is important and its achievement is a central, day to day working arrangement for ensuring the solidarity of the team. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.