4.6 Article

Antidepressant-like effect of liquiritin from Glycyrrhiza uralensis in chronic variable stress induced depression model rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 194, 期 1, 页码 108-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.06.030

关键词

liquiritin; Glycyrrhiza uralensis; antidepressant-like; chronic variable stress; forced swim test; superoxide dismutase; malondialdehyde

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7062039]
  2. National 211 Project Peking University EBM Group [404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many flavonoids extracted from nature plants have been reported to exert antidepressant-like effect in animal studies. The present Study was designed to observe the effects of liquiritin, a flavone compound derived from Glycyrrhiza uralensis, on the behaviors of chronic variable stress induced depression model rats and to explore the possible association between its antidepressant-like effect and antioxidative activity by measuring erythrocyte superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) level of the experimental animals. With the exposure to stressor once daily for consecutive 5 weeks, liquiritin and a positive control drug fluoxetine were administered via gastric intubation to rats once daily for consecutive 3 weeks from the 3rd week. The results showed that CVS reduced open-field activity and sucrose consumption significantly, but increased immobility time in forced swimming test. Treatment of liquiritin could effectively reverse alteration in immobility time and Sucrose consumption but did not show significant effect on open-field activity. Moreover, liquiritin could increase SOD activity, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and lessen production of MDA, while fluoxetine did not. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a potential antidepressant-like effect of liquiritin treatment on chronic variable Stress induced depression model Fats, which might be related to defense of liquiritin against oxidative stress. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据