4.5 Article

Lowering the line of visibility: incidental users in service encounters

期刊

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 245-260

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.563796

关键词

incidental user; services; service design; information presentation; trust; effectiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent economic and technological developments have led to the emergence of the services industry and to the important role that information technology (IT) plays in it. The emergence of IT-based services, which has merged people's roles as customers and users, calls for closer collaboration between the domains of human-computer interaction (HCI) and services science. This article offers three contributions within this context. First, we elaborate on the concept of the 'incidental user' - a person involved as a customer in a service encounter that includes exchange of information with an IT system, often mediated by a service representative who is the main user of the system. Second, we suggest that two key design aspects - sharing information with incidental users and increasing their control over the interaction - can improve the service provided by the organisation to its customers. We propose a theoretical model that describes the consequences of such design decisions on the incidental user and on the service encounter. Specifically, we propose that these decisions improve the effectiveness of the service encounter and customers' trust in the service-providing organisation. Finally, we suggest and demonstrate design solutions that expand the range of information exchanged between the service representative and the customer - by sharing information and/or by extending the level of interaction available to the customer. By applying established HCI practices and theories, and considering new design solutions, designers of service encounter environments can improve the customer's service experience and the service provider's effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据