Photoperiodic polyphenisms in rodents: Neuroendocrine mechanisms, costs, and functions

Annual changes in daylength figure prominently in the generation of seasonal rhythms in reproduction, and a wide variety of mammals use ambient photoperiod as a proximate cue to time critical reproductive events. Nevertheless, within many reproductively photoperiodic mammalian species, there exist individuals-termed photoperiod nonresponders'-that jail to adopt a seasonal breeding strategy and instead exhibit reproductive competence at a time of year when their conspecifics are reproductively quiescent. Photoperiod nonresponsiveness has been principally characterized by laboratory observations-over half of the species known to be reproductively photoperiodic contain a proportion of nonresponsive individuals. The study of nonresponders has generated basic insights regarding photic regulation of reproduction in mammals. The neuroendocrine mechanisms by which the short-day photoperiodic signal is degraded or lost in nonresponders varies between species: differences in features of the circadian pacemaker, which provides photoperiodic input to the reproductive neuroendocrine system, have been identified in hamsters; changes in the responsiveness of hypothalamic goradotrophs to melatonin and as-yet-unspecified inhibitory signals have been implicated in voles and mice. Individuals that continue to breed when their con-specifics refrain might enjoy higher fitness under certain circumstances. Statements regarding the adaptive function of reproductive nonresponsiveness to photoperiod require additional information on the costs (metabolic and fitness) of sustaining reproductive function during the winter months and how these costs vary as a function of environmental conditions. Reproductive nonresponders thus continue to represent a challenge to theories that extol the adaptive function of seasonality. Several nonexclusive hypotheses are proposed to account for the maintenance of nonresponsive individuals in wild rodent populations.