4.7 Article

The relationship between spectral correlation and envelope analysis in the diagnostics of bearing faults and other cyclostationary machine signals

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 945-962

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1415

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in applying cyclostationary analysis to the diagnostics of machine vibration signals. This is because some machine signals, while being almost periodic, are not exactly phase-locked to shaft speeds, and thus even after compensation for speed fluctuation cannot be extracted by synchronous averaging. Typical examples are the combustion events in IC engines, which vary from cycle to cycle, and impulsive signals from faults in rolling element bearings, which are affected by minor but randomly varying slip. Two main tools for the analysis of cyclostationary signals are the two-dimensional autocorrelation function us central time on the one axis and time displacement around the central time on the other, and its two-dimensional Fourier transform known as the spectral correlation. The latter can be quite complex to interpret, so some authors have suggested integrating it over all frequencies to obtain a Fourier series spectrum vs cyclic frequency. In this paper, it is shown that this gives the same result as a Fourier transform of the average squared envelope of the signal, which is much easier to obtain directly. Not only that, envelope analysis has long been used in the diagnostics of rolling element bearing signals, and some of the experience gained can be carried over to spectral correlation analysis. There is a possibility that the full spectral correlation may still give some advantage in distinguishing between modulation effects due to gear rotations and bearing inner race rotations (even at the same speed) by virtue of the different amounts of randomness associated with each. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据