4.7 Article

Dibutyryl-cyclic GMP induces peripheral antinociception via activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the rat PGE2-induced hyperalgesic paw

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 134, 期 1, 页码 127-131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704224

关键词

DbcGMP morphine; K+ channel blockers; glibenclamide; antinociception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Using the rat paw pressure test, in which increased sensitivity is induced by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E-2, we studied the action of several K+ channel blockers in order to determine what types of K+ channels could be involved in the peripheral antinociception induced by dibutyrylguanosine 3: 5'-cyclic monophosphate (DbcGMP), a membrane permeable analogue of cyclic GMP. 2 DbcGMP elicited a dose-dependent (50. 75, 100 and 200 mug paw(-1)) peripheral antinociceptive effect. The effect of the 100 pg dose of DbcGMP was considered to be local since only a higher dose (300 mug paw(-1)) produced antinociception in the contralateral paw. 3 The antinociceptive effect of DbcGMP (100 mug paw(-1)) was dose-dependently antagonized by intraplantar administration of the sulphonylureas tolbutamide (20. 40 and 160 mug) and glibenclamide (40, 80 and 160 mug), selective blockers of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. 4 Charybdotoxin (2 mug paw(-1)), a selective blocker of high conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels, and apamin (10 mug paw(-1)), a selective blocker of low conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels, did not modify the peripheral antinociception induced by DbcGMP. 5 Tetraethylammonium (2 mg paw(-1)), 4-aminopyridine (200 mug paw(-1)) and cesium (800 paw(-1)), non-selective voltage-gated potassium channel blockers, also had no effect. 6 Based on this experimental evidence. we conclude that the activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels could be the mechanism by which DbcGMP induces peripheral anti nociception, and that Ca2+ activated K+ channels and voltage-dependent K+ channels appear not to be involved in the process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据