4.4 Article

Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic study of marine Cytophaga-like bacteria:: proposal for Tenacibaculum gen. nov with Tenacibaculum maritimum comb. nov and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum comb. nov., and description of Tenacibaculum mesophilum sp nov and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum sp nov.

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-51-5-1639

关键词

Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides complex; gyrB; 16S rDNA; taxonomy; Tenacibaculum gen. nov.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial strains were isolated from sponge and green algae which were collected on the coast of Japan and Palau. The phylogenetic relationships of these isolates among marine species of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides complex were analysed by using their gyrB nucleotide sequences and translated peptide sequences (GyrB) in addition to 16S rDNA sequences. These isolates were closely related to the previously characterized marine Flexibacter species, [Flexibacter] maritimus and [Flexibacter] ovolyticus. These Flexibacter species are distantly related to Flexibacter flexilis, the type species of the genus Flexibacter, and phylogenetically belong to the family Flavobacteriaceae (according to analysis using both 16S rDNA and GyrB sequences). Their phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic characteristics prompted the proposal that these two species should be transferred to the new genus Tenacibaculum, as Tenacibaculum maritimum and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum, respectively. Two additional new species of the genus Tenacibaculum, Tenacibaculum mesophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. (= MBIC 1140(T) = IFO 16307(T)) and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov. (= MBIC 4355(T) = IFO 16310(T)) which were isolated from sponges and macroalgae, are also reported. For taxonomic considerations at the species level, the resolution of gyrB sequences was superior to that of 16S rDNA sequences, and the grouping based on the gyrB phylogram was consistent with DNA-DNA hybridization results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据