3.8 Article

Locoregional recurrence of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: second chance of cure for selected patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 564-568

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1166

关键词

soft tissue sarcoma; retroperitoneum; recurrence; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Locoregional recurrence of a retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS) may offer a second chance of curative surgical treatment. In a population-based study the proportion of patients developing isolated locoregional recurrences (LR) was determined and the outcome of these patients was analysed. Method: In a retrospective nationwide study, data were collected on 142 patients treated between I January 1989 and I January 1994 for primary RSTS. In patients who had been treated radically for their primary sarcoma (77/142, 54%), the pattern of recurrence was evaluated. Factors predictive of survival for patients with LR were studied. Results: After a median follow-up of 86 (range 60-101) months, 32 patients (42%) had developed LR, and distant metastasis (DM) had been diagnosed in 17 patients (22%). Median disease-free interval between the initial operation and the establishment of LR or DM was 22 and 19 months, respectively. Five-year cumulative survival of patients with established LR was 37% in comparison with 11% for patients with DM (P=0.062). Factors predictive of favourable outcome in patients with LR were the absence of multifocal recurrence (n = 13; P = 0.01), lipomatous histomorphology (n = 20; P = 0.02), and a complete resection of recurrent sarcoma (n = 17; P = 0.04). Conclusion: After a median follow-up of 7 years following radical treatment of a primary RSTS, 42% of the patients had developed isolated locoregional recurrences. A complete resection of recurrent disease, lipomatous histomorphology and the absence of multifocal growth influenced prognosis favourably. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据