4.4 Article

Enadoline, a selective kappa opioid agonist: comparison with butorphanol and hydromorphone in humans

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 157, 期 2, 页码 151-162

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002130100788

关键词

enadoline; butorphanol; hydromorphone; mu opioid; kappa opioid; human; mixed agonist-antagonist; CI-977

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K05-DA 00050, T32-DA07209, R01-DA 10753] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: The availability of the highly selective and specific kappa opioid agonist enadoline provides an opportunity to explore the function of kappa receptors in humans and their potential utility as a target for substance abuse pharmacotherapy development. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamic effects of enadoline, a selective kappa agonist, and to compare it with butorphanol, a mixed mu/kappa agonist, and hydromorphone, a mu agonist, in humans. Methods: Pilot evaluation (n=3) served to establish intramuscular doses of enadoline (20, 40, 80, and 160 mug/70 kg), butorphanol (1.5, 3, 6, and 12 mg/70 kg), and hydromorphone (1.5, 3, and 6 mg/70 kg) of comparable activity. These acute doses were examined under double-blind, placebo-controlled and constrained randomized conditions with a minimum of 72 h between tests in volunteers with polysubstance abuse histories (n=6). Physiological and subject- and observer-rated measures were collected 30 min before and for 4 h after administration. Results: Enadoline significantly increased measures of sedation, confusion and dizziness, produced visual distortions and feelings of depersonalization, and increased urinary output. The highest dose (160 mug/70 kg) was not tolerated and led to psychotomimetic effects. Hydromorphone produced prototypic mu opioid effects including respiratory depression, miosis, and euphoria. Butorphanol was most similar to hydromorphone and shared few effects with enadoline. Conclusions: These results are discussed with respect to the potential use and safety of kappa agonists for clinical indications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据