4.5 Article

The role of refugia in reducing predation risk for Cape fur seals by white sharks

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 127-138

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-014-1825-5

关键词

Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus; Carcharodon carcharias; Dyer Island; Refuge use; Anti-predator tactics; Shark Alley

资金

  1. Dyer Island Conservation Trust
  2. Volkswagen South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Refugia play an important role in shaping predator/prey interactions; however, few studies have investigated predator-prey relationships between large marine vertebrates, mainly due to the logistical challenges of studying marine species. The predictable interactions between Cape fur seals and white sharks in South Africa at two neighbouring seal colonies (Seal Island and Geyser Rock) with similar breeding conditions, but distinct adjacent seascapes, offer an opportunity to address this gap. Geyser Rock differs from Seal Island in being surrounded by abundant refugia in the form of kelp beds and shallow reefs, while Seal Island is mostly surrounded by deep open water. In this study, we compare data collected from Geyser Rock to the published data at Seal Island and ask, do seals adjust their anti-predator tactics as a function of landscape features? We found that during periods of high white shark presence, seals at Geyser Rock reduced their presence in open-water and utilized areas that contained complex landscapes around the colony. Although seals at Geyser Rock formed groups when traversing open water, neither group size (high risk median = 4, low risk median = 5) nor temporal movement patterns varied significantly with white shark presence as has been shown at Seal Island. Furthermore, recorded hourly predation rates at Seal Island were 12.5 times higher than at Geyser Rock. Together, these findings suggest that refuge use may be the more effective anti-predator response of seals to a seasonally abundant predator and that the predations at Seal Island reflect a comparative lack of refugia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据