4.4 Article

In vivo activation of dendritic cells and T cells during Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium infection

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 5726-5735

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5726-5735.2001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was initiated to gain insight into the interaction between splenic dendritic cells (DC) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in vivo. Splenic phagocytic cell populations associated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing bacteria and the bacterium-specific T-cell response were evaluated in mice given S. enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing GFP and ovalbumin. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that GFP-positive splenic DC (CD11c(+) major histocompatibility complex class II-positive [MHC-II+] cells) were present following bacterial administration, and confocal microscopy showed that GFP-expressing bacteria were contained within CD11c(+) MHC-II+ splenocytes. Furthermore, splenic DC and T cells were activated following Salmonella infection. This was shown by increased surface expression of CD86 and CD40 on CD11c(+) MHC-II+ cells and increased CD44 and CD69 expression on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Salmonella-specific gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-producing cells in both of these T-cell subsets, as well as cytolytic effector cells, were also generated in mice given live bacteria. The frequency of Salmonella-specific CD4(+) T cells producing IFN-gamma was greater than that of specific CD8(+) T cells producing IFN-gamma in the same infected animal. This supports the argument that the predominant source of IFN-gamma production by cells of the specific immune response is CD4(+) T cells. Finally, DC that phagocytosed live or heat-killed Salmonella in vitro primed bacterium-specific IFN-gamma -producing CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells as well as cytolytic effector cells following administration into naive mice. Together these data suggest that DC are involved in priming naive T cells to Salmonella in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据