4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Glutamine supplementation in cancer patients

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 766-768

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00629-3

关键词

cancer cachexia; radiotherapy; chemotherapy; immunotherapy; radioisotope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Three series of studies investigated whether 1) glutamine deficiency occurs in tumor-bearing rats, 2) glutamine supplementation improves protein metabolism during chemotherapy in tumor-bearing rats, and 3) oral glutamine supplement improves systemic immune and gut-barrier function in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiochemotherapy. METHODS: In the animal studies, AH109A hepatoma cells or Yoshida sarcoma cells were inoculated into male Donryu rats to induce tumors. Glutamine production was measured by U-C-14-glutamine infusion and the conversion of arginine to glutamine was measured by infusion of U-C-14-arginine. The effect of glutamine on protein metabolism was investigated by 1-C-14-leucine infusion. In the clinical study, 13 patients with esophageal cancer were randomized into two groups, control and glutamine supplemented (30 g/d), for 4 wk. RESULTS: Glutamine levels in plasma and skeletal muscle were decreased in tumor-bearing rats, although glutamine production and the conversion of arginine to glutamine were increased. Glutamine-supplemented total parenteral nutrition reduced whole-body protein breakdown rate during chemotherapy in tumor-bearing rats. Oral supplementation of glutamine to the patients with esophageal cancer enhanced lymphocyte mitogenic function and reduced permeability of the gut during radiochemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Glutamine depletion in host tissues occurs in tumor-bearing rats. Glutamine supplementation can attenuate loss of protein in the muscle in tumor-bearing animals and protect immune and gut-barrier function during radiochemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Nutrition 2001;17: 766-768. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2001.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据