4.5 Article

Pursuit deterrence, predation risk, and escape in the lizard Callisaurus draconoides

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 65, 期 9, 页码 1833-1841

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1191-5

关键词

Antipredatory behavior; Escape behavior; Flight initiation distance; Predation risk; Pursuit deterrence; Refuge use; Squamata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The frequency of pursuit-deterrent signaling should vary with predation risk for factors affecting decisions to flee and hide. Distance to refuge, temperature, and microhabitat types affect risk, and their effects may differ among defenses. Because risk is greater farther from refuge and at lower temperatures that impair escape ability in ectotherms, I predicted that when farther from refuge ectothermic prey flee sooner, enter refuge more frequently, and signal more frequently. At low temperatures, prey should flee sooner, enter refuge, and signal less frequently. Because signaling sometimes deters attack, lowered risk might allow prey to permit closer approach when signaling. In the zebra-tailed lizard Callisaurus draconoides, which signals by waving its tail, signaling and the other behaviors were affected by the same risk factors. Probability of signaling before fleeing increased with distance to refuge and temperature, but variation in temperature accounted for the effect of distance to refuge. Lizards signaled not at all at low temperatures, after starting to flee at intermediate temperatures, and before, during, and after fleeing at higher temperatures. This pattern is consistent with honest signaling of escape ability. Refuge entry was more frequent nearer refuge (lower risk) and at lower temperature (higher risk). Display was less frequent on rock than ground, possibly due to conspicuousness or delay in attaining high speed. Flight initiation distance was shorter after signaling. This novel finding suggests that signaling reduces risk and prey alter escape decisions based on lower risk as a consequence of their own signaling behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据