4.7 Article

Determination of association constants of inorganic ions with C12- and C14-alkyldimethylammoniopropane sulfonate zwitterionic surfactants using capillary electrochromatography

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 442, 期 2, 页码 221-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01177-1

关键词

zwitterionic surfactant; association constant; inorganic anions and cations; micelles; capillary electrochromatography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Association constants (K-ass) of 10 inorganic anions (chloride, bromide, iodide, nitrite, nitrate, chlorate, thiocyanate, iodate, perchlorate, and molybdate) and seven inorganic cations (lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, caesium, magnesium, and cerium(III)) with micelles of two zwitterionic surfactants 3-(N,N-dimethyldodecylammonio)propane sulfonate (C12N3S) and 3-(N,N-dimethylmyristylammonio)propane sulfonate (C14N3S) were determined using capillary electrochromatography (CEC). These K-ass values of anions with C12N3S increased as follows: Cl- (4.2 +/-0.1) < IO3- (4.6 +/-0.1) < Br- (5.90.1) < NO2- (6.2 +/- 0.1) < MoO42- (7.8 +/- 0.1) < NO3- (14 +/- 1) < ClO3- (26 +/- 1) < I- (68 7) < SCN- (310 30) < ClO4- (800 +/- 200) dm(3) mol(-1). Similar K-ass values were obtained for C14N3S micelles, but K-ass values of these anions with a non-ionic surfactant and with a non-surfactant-type zwitterion (used for comparative purposes) were small. The Kris values of cations with the C12N3S micelle in 10 mM imidazole-20 mM 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer of pH 6.2 increased as follows: Rb+ (1.4 +/- 0.1) = Cs+ (1.4 +/- 0.1) = K+ (1.4 +/- 0.1) < Na+ (3.2 0.1) < Li+ (4.5 0.1) < Mg2+ (7.8 0.1) < Ce3+ (12 1) dm(3) mol(-1). The fact that the K-ass values for polarisable anions, such as iodide and thiocyanate, were larger than those of cations of +2 and +3 charge, agrees well with the relative retentions for those ions in electrostatic ion chromatography (EIC). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据