4.8 Article

2-(Hydroxycarbonyl)benzyl glycosides:: A novel type of glycosyl donors for highly efficient β-mannopyranosylation and oligosaccharide synthesis by latent-active glycosylation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 123, 期 35, 页码 8477-8481

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja015842s

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-(Benzyloxycarbonyl)benzyl (BCB) glycosides were prepared by coupling of the corresponding tetraacetylglycosyl bromides and benzyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)benzoate. The BCB glycosides were converted almost quantitatively into the corresponding 2-(hydroxycarbonyl)benzyl (HCB) glycosides by selective hydrogenolysis of the benzyl ester functionality without affecting the benzylidene acetal and the benzyl ether. Treatment of the HCB 4,6-O-benzylidenemannopyranoside.4 with triflic anhydride in the presence of di-tert-butylmethylpyridine and subsequent addition of the glycosyl acceptor having a primary hydroxyl group afforded exclusively the disaccharide of the beta -mannopyranosyl linkage. Glycosylation of the compound 4 with secondary and tertiary alcohols also provided beta -mannopyranosides as the major products. Glycosylation of the HCB 4,6-O-cyclohexylidenemannoside 5 with primary alcohols was also highly beta -selective, and the HCB 2,3-O-cyclohexylidenemannoside 6 exhibited the moderate beta -selectivity. On the other hand, unlike the HCB mannosides, the HCB 4,6-O-benzylideneglucoside 7 gave exclusively the disaccharides of the alpha -glycopyranosyl linkage in the glycosylation with primary alcohols. The latent BCB-disaccharide 23, which was obtained from the HCB mannoside 4 as the donor and the BCB glucoside 12 as the acceptor by the present glycosylation method, was converted into the active HCB-disaccharide 39 by selective hydrogenolysis. Repetitive glycosylation of the donor 39 with the same acceptor 12 afforded the BCB-trisaccharide 40. Other BCB-trisaccharides 42 and 46 were also efficiently synthesized by employing the present methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据