4.6 Article

A role for mitochondrial Bak in apoptotic response to anticancer drugs

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 36, 页码 34307-34317

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M103526200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 84134-01, R01 CA83817-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [P01DE 12321-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study a clonal Jurkat cell line deficient in expression of Bak was used to analyze the role of Bak in cytochrome c release from mitochondria. The Bak-deficient T leukemic cells were resistant to apoptosis induced by UV, staurosporin, VP-16, bleomycin, or cisplatin. In contrast to wild type Jurkat cells, these Bak-deficient cells did not respond to UV or treatment with these anticancer drugs by membranous phosphatidylserine exposure, DNA breaks, activation of caspases, or release of mitochondrial cytochrome c. The block in the apoptotic cascade was in the mitochondrial mechanism for cytochrome c release because purified mitochondria from Bak-deficient cells failed to release cytochrome c or apoptosis-inducing factor in response to recombinant Bax or truncated Bid. The resistance of Bak-deficient cells to VP-16 was reversed by transduction of the Bak gene into these cells. Also, the cytochrome c releasing capability of the Bak-deficient mitochondria was restored by insertion of recombinant Bak protein into purified mitochondria. Following mitochondrial localization, low dose recombinant Bak restored the mitochondrial release of cytochrome c in response to Bax; at increased doses it induced cytochrome c release itself. The function of Bak is independent of Bid and Bax because recombinant Bak induced cytochrome c release from mitochondria purified from Bax(-/-), Bid(-/-), or Bid(-/-) Bax(-/-) mice. Together, our findings suggest that Bak plays a key role in the apoptotic machinery of cytochrome c release and thus in the chemoresistance of human T leukemic cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据