4.5 Article

Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information?

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 269-276

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-008-0658-5

关键词

Behavioural plasticity; Inconsistent information; Mate-choice copying; Monogamous species; Zebra finches

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a long time, mate-choice copying was thought to be restricted to lekking and polygynous species. Yet, recent experimental studies revealed that social information can play a role in the evolution of mate preferences in monogamous species with biparental care. However, this phenomenon has been demonstrated only under particular conditions and the prevalence and importance of this phenomenon therefore remains to be evaluated. In particular, previous laboratory experiments have consisted in exposing test females to only one paired male at a time, while under natural conditions monogamous females are likely to observe the choice of several females before making a decision. Thus, in the present study, female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) could observe two model females simultaneously, that provided either inconsistent or consistent information, depending on whether they were interacting with different types of males or with males of a same phenotype. We found that the relative importance given to private and social information on females' preferences varied with the consistency of social information and females significantly changed their preference only when social information was consistent. There was, nevertheless, a large variation in their responses. We suggest that such variations could be due to the fact that the benefits of mate-choice copying are frequency-dependent, and that this constrain would further contribute to limit the use of social information in monogamous species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据