4.6 Article

An antagonist IL-15/Fc protein prevents costimulation blockade-resistant rejection

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 167, 期 6, 页码 3478-3485

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.6.3478

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-15 is a powerful T cell growth factor (TCGF) with particular importance for the maintenance of CD8(+) T cells. Because costimulation blockade does not result in universal tolerance, we hypothesized that escape from costimulation blockade might represent a CD8(+) and IL-I 5/IL-15R(+)-dependent process. For this analysis, we have used an IL-15 mutant/Fc gamma 2a protein, a potentially cytolytic protein that is also a high-affinity receptor site specific antagonist for the IL-15R alpha receptor protein, as a therapeutic agent. The IL-15-related fusion protein was used as monotherapy or in combination with CTLA4/Fc in murine islet allograft models. As monotherapies, CTLA4/Fc and an IL-15 mutant/Fc gamma 2a were comparably effective in a semiallogeneic model system, and combined treatment with IL-15 mutant/Fc gamma 2a plus CTLA4/Fc produced universal permanent engraftment. In a fully MHC-mismatched strain combination known to be refractory to costimulation blockade treatment, combined treatment with both fusion proteins proved to be highly effective; > 70% of recipients were tolerized. The analysis revealed that the IL-15 mutant/Fc treatment confers partial protection from both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell graft infiltration. In rejections occurring despite CTLA4/Fc treatment, concomitant treatment with the IL-15 mutant/Fc gamma 2a protein blocked a CD8(+) T cell-dominated rejection processes. This protection was linked to a blunted proliferative response of alloreactive T cells as well silencing of CTL-related gene expression events. Hence, we have demonstrated that targeting the IL-15/IL-15R pathway represents a new and potent strategy to prevent costimulation blockade-resistant CD8(+) T cell-driven rejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据