4.7 Article

Influence of plantation site and wastewater sludge fertilization on the performance and foliar nutrient status of two willow species grown under SRIC in southern Quebec (Canada)

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 150, 期 3, 页码 223-239

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00567-3

关键词

SRIC; productivity; Salix; foliar analysis; nutrient status; wastewater sludge

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salix discolor MUM. (Sd) and Salix viminalis L. (Sv) were planted under short-rotation intensive culture (SRIC) on three unirrigated abandoned farmland sites with different drainage conditions, one well-drained (S-1) and the other two poorly-drained (S-2, S-3). One dose of dried and granulated sludge equivalent to 150 (TI) kg of available N ha(-1) was applied to some plots in the spring of the second season while others were left unfertilized (TO). The aims of the experiment were (i) to investigate plant response (growth and productivity) to plantation site conditions and sludge application; (ii) study nutrient status by foliar analysis. Over three seasons, growth in height and aboveground biomass were greater for S. viminalis than for S. discolor on all sites. S. viminalis planted on poorly-drained site 2 had the highest biomass yield (45.28 t ha(-1) ). Both species showed best height and diameter growth on poorly-drained sites. For both species, best performances were obtained on wastewater sludge fertilized plots. Comparative foliar analysis suggested that unfertilized sandy soil (S-1) and low foliar nitrogen concentration and content were limiting factors in the performance of the two species. Soil nitrate concentration increased as a result of sludge application. Heavy metal accumulation from sludge does not represent a risk to the environment. It was concluded that S. viminalis had the best productivity on clay sites, and that a moderate dose of dried and pelleted sludge (150 kg of available N ha(-1)) may be a good fertilizer during the establishment of willows in SRIC, and may reduce nitrate leaching. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据