4.6 Article

Interrelations of ATP synthesis and proton handling in ischaemically exercising human forearm muscle studied by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 535, 期 3, 页码 901-928

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00901.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. In ischaemic exercise ATP is supplied only by glycogenolysis and net splitting of phosphocreatine (PCr). Furthermore, 'proton balance' involves only glycolytic lactate/H+ generation and net H+ 'consumption' by PCr splitting. This work examines the interplay between these, metabolic regulation and the creatine kinase equilibrium. 2. Nine male subjects (age 25-45 years) performed finger flexion (7 % maximal voluntary contraction at 0.67 Hz) under cuff ischaemia. P-31 magnetic resonance spectra were acquired from finger flexor muscle in a 4.7 T magnet using a 5 cm surface coil. 3. Initial PCr depletion rate estimates total ATP turnover rate; glycolytic ATP synthesis was obtained from this and changes in [PCr], and then used to obtain flux through 'distal' glycolysis (phosphofructokinase and beyond) to lactate; 'proximal' flux (through phosphorylase) vas obtained from this and changes in [phosphomonoester]. Total H+ load (lactate load less H+ consumption) was used to estimate cytosolic buffer capacity (beta). 4. Glycolytic ATP synthesis increased from near zero while PCr splitting declined. Net H+ load was approximately linear with pH, suggesting beta = 20 mmol 1(-1) (pH unit)(-1) at rest, increasing as pH falls. 5. Relationships between glycolytic rate and changes in [PCr] (i.e. the time-integrated mismatch between ATP use and production), and thus also [P-i] (substrate for phosphorylase), suggest that increase in glycolysis is due partly to 'open-loop' Ca2+-dependent conversion of phosphorylase b to a, and partly to the 'closed loop' increase in P-i consequent on net PCr splitting. 6. The 'settings' of these mechanisms have a strong influence on changes in pH and metabolite concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据