4.8 Article

Coordination number incommensurate cluster formation, part 21 -: Design, formation and properties of tetrahedral M4L4 and M4L6 supramolecular clusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 123, 期 37, 页码 8923-8938

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0104507

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rigid tris- and bis(catecholamide) ligands H(6)A, H4B and H4C form tetrahedral clusters of the type M4L4 and M4L6 through self-assembly reactions with tri- and tetravalent metal ions such as Ga-III, Fe-III, Ti-IV and Sn-IV. General design principles for the synthesis of such clusters are presented with an emphasis on geometric requirements and kinetic and thermodynamic considerations. The solution and solid-state characterization of these complexes is presented, and their dynamic solution behavior is described. The tris-catecholamide H(6)A forms M4L4 tetrahedra with Ga-III, Ti-IV, and Sn-IV; (Et3N)(8)[Ti(4)A(4)] crystallizes in R(3) over bar c (No. 167), with a = 22.6143(5) Angstrom, c = 106.038(2) Angstrom. The cluster is a racemic mixture of homoconfigurational. tetrahedra (all Delta or all A at the metal centers within a given cluster). Though the synthetic procedure for synthesis of the cluster is markedly metal-dependent, extensive electrospray mass spectrometry investigations show that the M(4)A(4) (M = Ga-III, Ti-IV, and Sn-IV) clusters are remarkably stable once formed. Two approaches are presented for the formation Of M4L6 tetrahedral clusters. Of the bis(catecholamide) ligands, H4B forms an M4L6 tetrahedron (M = Ga-III) based on an edge-on design, while H4C forms an M4L6 tetrahedron (M = Ga-III, Fe-III) based on a face-on strategy. K-5[Et4N](7)[Fe4C6] crystallizes in I (4) over bar 3d (No. 220) with a = 43.706(8) Angstrom. This M4L6 tetrahedral cluster is also a racemic mixture of homoconfigurational tetrahedra and has a cavity large enough to encapsulate a molecule of Et4N+. This host-guest interaction is maintained in solution as revealed by NMR investigations of the Ga-III complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据