4.5 Article

Water-seeking behavior in worm-infected crickets and reversibility of parasitic manipulation

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 392-400

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq215

关键词

behavior; insects; nematomorph; parasite manipulation; parasitism; phototaxis

资金

  1. French Ministry of Research
  2. Human Frontier Science Program
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [FI.071215.01.01]
  4. Marcel Roche Library - Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas (part of the Venezuelan Ministry of People's Power for Science, Technology and Medium-Sized Industry)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most fascinating examples of parasite-induced host manipulation is that of hairworms, first, because they induce a spectacular suicide'' water-seeking behavior in their terrestrial insect hosts and, second, because the emergence of the parasite is not lethal per se for the host that can live several months following parasite release. The mechanisms hairworms use to increase the encounter rate between their host and water remain, however, poorly understood. Considering the selective landscape in which nematomorph manipulation has evolved as well as previously obtained proteomics data, we predicted that crickets harboring mature hairworms would display a modified behavioral response to light. Since following parasite emergence in water, the cricket host and parasitic worm do not interact physiologically anymore, we also predicted that the host would recover from the modified behaviors. We examined the effect of hairworm infection on different behavioral responses of the host when stimulated by light to record responses from uninfected, infected, and ex-infected crickets. We showed that hairworm infection fundamentally modifies cricket behavior by inducing directed responses to light, a condition from which they mostly recover once the parasite is released. This study supports the idea that host manipulation by parasites is subtle, complex, and multidimensional.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据