4.5 Article

Monogamous dominant pairs monopolize reproduction in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 559-565

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr018

关键词

cooperative breeding; inbreeding; monogamy; pied babbler; reproductive skew; Turdoides bicolor

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute for African Ornithology, University of Cape Town [426078PFP1074]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NBAF010001] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how reproduction is partitioned between group members is essential in explaining the apparent reproductive altruism of cooperatively breeding systems. Here, we use genetic data from a population of cooperatively breeding pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) to show that reproduction is highly skewed toward behaviorally dominant birds. Dominant birds monopolized reproduction, accounting for 95.2% of all chicks. Inbreeding avoidance appears to constrain subordinate reproduction because the rare incidences of subordinate reproduction occurred only with unrelated members of their groups. However, even when unrelated potential breeding partners were present in the group, subordinates rarely bred. Although half of chicks hatched into groups where subordinates could potentially breed, only 9.6% of these chicks had a subordinate parent, indicating that additional factors limit subordinate reproduction, such as reproductive conflict with dominants. Groups were highly kin structured and most subordinates were closely related to one another such that help was almost invariably directed toward close relatives. Consequently, helping in this species confers indirect fitness benefits on subordinates, which are likely to play an important role in the evolution and maintenance of cooperative helping behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据