4.7 Article

Synthesis of boronic acid analogues of α-amino acids by introducing side chains as electrophiles

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 19, 页码 6375-6380

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo015753y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A synthetic route has been developed which has allowed us to prepare novel alpha -aminoboronic acids as inhibitors of serine proteases. These compounds were prepared to study the roles of proteases in biological systems. This methodology affords a-aminoboronic acids with the general formula R ' -NHCH(R)BO2-pinanediol, where R = -CH2CHF2, -CH(2)CO(2)tBu, and -(CH2)(2)CO2Me and R '= either H or C(O)R . The latter two compounds are the boronic acid analogues of the natural amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid with the side chain carboxylate protected as a tert-butyl or a methyl ester, respectively. Following acylation of the amino group, the side chain tert-butyl ester of boroaspartic acid was removed by treatment with TFA. Boroglutamic acid was obtained as the free boronic acid by hydrolysis with HCL Prior syntheses of alpha -aminoboronic acids involve the initial addition of an organometallic reagent to a trialkyl borate ester. These conditions do not allow the preparation of compounds with functionalities that are not stable to the strongly basic reaction conditions. The methodology described here allows the preparation of alpha -aminoboronic acids by introducing side chains as electrophiles. This is particularly advantageous for side chains which are prone to elimination or unwanted enolate formation. Specifically, BrCH2CHF2, (BrCH2COOBu)-Bu-t, and CH2=CHCOOMe were allowed to react with the stabilized anion of (phenylthio)methane boronate, PhSCH2BO2C6H12, to give the substituted boronate. The substituted (phenylthio)methane boronate was converted to the corresponding sulfonium ion by treatment with methyl iodide and subsequently displaced with iodide. The a-iodo derivative was converted to the amine by conventional methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据