4.6 Article

Estrogen receptor (ER)-α, but not ER-β, mediates regulation of the insulin-like growth factor I gene by antiestrogens

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 38, 页码 35444-35449

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M105418200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) on maintenance of skeletal integrity has been widely recognized. Although osteoblasts secrete some IGF-I, the liver is the primary endocrine source for IGF-L We have studied the regulation of the human IGF-l promoter in the hepatocyte cell line Hep3B, and we have shown that the IGF-I promoter, when co-transfected in Hep3B cells together with an estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha expression vector, was transcriptionally regulated by raloxifene or raloxifene-like molecules but not by 17 beta -estradiol and 4(OH)-tamoxifen. The induction mediated by raloxifene is antagonized by 17 beta -estradiol and mediated selectively by ER-alpha, but not by ER-beta. Transfer of IGF-I promoter sequences from -733 to -65 or from -375 to -65 to a minimal Fos promoter resulted in a comparable responsiveness to raloxifene. This region contains two CAAT/enhancer-binding protein sites and an activator protein 1 site, both of which have been shown to be involved in estrogen receptor-mediated transactivation. When the CAAT/enhancer-binding protein sites were mutated in a construct bearing the sequence from -375 to -65 in front of the minimal Fos promoter, raloxifene induction was reduced, whereas mutation of the other elements did not affect induction. In addition, using chimeric proteins, we delineated the domains of ER-alpha that confer to ER-alpha transactivation abilities on the IGF-l promoter that are not exhibited by ER-beta These data shed new light on the mechanism of action of antiestrogens and might help explain, at least in part, the bone-protective effects observed for some antiestrogens in ovariectomized animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据