4.4 Article

Anion shielding of electrostatic repulsions in transthyretin modulates stability and amyloidosis:: Insight into the chaotrope unfolding dichotomy

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 38, 页码 11453-11459

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi010673+

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK46335-09] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The balance between stabilizing forces and the localized electrostatic repulsions destabilizing the transthyretin (TTR) tetramer is tunable via anion shielding. The two symmetrical anion interaction sites in TTR are comprised of residues Lys15 and Lys15 from opposing subunits on the periphery of the two thyroxine binding sites. These is an element of -ammonium groups repel one another and destabilize the tetramer, unless an appropriate anion is present, which stabilizes the tetramer. Chaotrope denaturation of TTR exhibits unusual behavior in that urea appears to be a stronger denaturant than GdmCl (guanidinium chloride), even though GdmCl is typically twice as powerful as a denaturant. The shift in the midpoint of the urea denaturation curve to higher concentrations as well as the increase in the mole fraction of tetramer that is highly resistant to denaturation with increasing KCI concentration provides strong evidence that anion shielding stabilizes the TTR tetramer. A consequence of tetramer stabilization is folding hysteresis, because the high GdmCl concentrations required to denature the anion-stabilized tetramer do not allow refolding of the unfolded monomers. The formation of amyloid fibrils by TTR requires that its normal tetrameric structure dissociate to alternatively folded monomers, a process mediated by acidification (pH 5-4). This process is inhibited by Cl- ions in a concentration-dependent fashion. Chloride ion may not be the relevant physiological TTR stability modulator, but it is the main focus of these studies explaining the hysteresis observed in the denaturation and refolding studies with GdmCl.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据