4.5 Article

Carotenoid-based status signaling by females in the tropical streak-backed oriole

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 1000-1006

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp089

关键词

elaborate monomorphism; female ornamentation; female territoriality; sexual selection; social selection; status signal

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Americas Program [0700953]
  3. NSF CAREER [DEB-0347083]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many tropical bird species, both males and females maintain elaborate plumage traits. Although there is considerable evidence that many male plumage traits function as status signals that convey information about fighting ability, less is known about status signaling in females. We tested whether the carotenoid-based orange breast coloration of the female streak-backed oriole (Icterus pustulatus pustulatus) signals status during territorial interactions. To do this, we simulated territorial intrusions using taxidermic models and compared the roles of the sexes within pairs during territorial defense directed toward different types of simulated intruders. Females were more territorial than their mates during the breeding season, whereas males were more territorial than their mates in the nonbreeding season, contrary to patterns seen in studies of temperate zone birds. The coloration of simulated female intruders also influenced territorial responses: When presented with color-augmented female models, females responded with greater intensity than their mates, whereas the intensity of defense was similar for both sexes when presented with average-colored female models. The greater female response to more colorful intruders suggests that females perceive more ornamented females as greater threats to their territorial tenure or to their pair bond. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that female carotenoid-based coloration signals status in this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据