4.6 Article

Mechanisms of nuclear import and export that control the subcellular localization of class II transactivator

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 167, 期 7, 页码 3626-3634

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.3626

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI45580, AI29564] Funding Source: Medline
  2. BHP HRSA HHS [AH41751] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of the class II transactivator (CIITA) activates the transcription of all MHC class II genes. Previously, we reported that deletion of a carboxyl-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS) results in the cytoplasmic localization of CIITA and one form of the type II bare lymphocyte syndrome. However, further sequential carboxyl-terminal deletions of CIITA resulted in mutant forms of the protein that localized predominantly to the nucleus, suggesting the presence of one or more additional NLS in the remaining sequence. We identified a 10-aa motif at residues 405-414 of CIITA that contains strong residue similarity to the classical SV40 NLS. Deletion of this region results in cytoplasmic localization of CIITA and loss of transactivation activity, both of which can be rescued by replacement with the SV40 NLS. Fusion of this sequence to a heterologous protein results in its nuclear translocation, confirming the identification of a NLS. In addition to nuclear localization sequences, CIITA is also controlled by nuclear export. Leptomycin B, an inhibitor of export, blocked the nuclear to cytoplasmic translocation of CIITA; however, leptomycin did not alter the localization of the NLS mutant, indicating that this region mediates only the rate of import and does not affect CIITA export. Several candidate nuclear export sequences were also found in CIITA and one affected the export of a heterologous protein. In summary, we have demonstrated that CIITA localization is balanced between the cytoplasm and nucleus due to the presence of NLS and nuclear export signal sequences in the CIITA protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据