4.7 Article

Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are an early marker of acute myocardial infarction

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 1002-1006

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01485-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether elevated levels, of circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) can be used to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Commonly used blood markers of AMI reflect myocardial cell death, but do not reflect the earlier pathophysiologic processes of plaque rupture, platelet activation and resultant thrombus formation. Circulating MPA form after platelet activation. METHODS In a single center between October 1998 and November 1999, we measured circulating MPA in a blinded fashion by whole blood flow cytometry in 211 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and were admitted to rule out AMI. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed by a CK-MB fraction greater than three times control. RESULTS Patients with AMI (n = 61), as compared with those without AMI (n = 150), had significantly higher numbers of circulating WA (11.6 +/- 11.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 3.6,mean +/- SD, p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, the adjusted odds of developing AMI for patients in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles of MPA, in comparison with patients in die lowest quartile (odds ratio = 1.0), were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7, 6.8), 4.4 (95% CI: 1.5, 13.1) and 10.8 (95% CI: 3.6, 32.0), respectively. The number of circulating MPA in patients with AMI presenting within 4 h of symptom onset (14.4) was significantly greater than those presenting after 4 h (9.4) and after 8 h (7.0), (p < 0.001). Of the 61 patients with AMI, 35 (57%) had a normal creatine kinase isoenzyme ratio at the time of presentation to the ED, but had high levels of circulating, NTA (13.3). CONCLUSIONS Circulating MPA are an early marker of AMI. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据