4.7 Article

Increased expression of utrophin in a slow vs. a fast muscle involves posttranscriptional events

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 281, 期 4, 页码 C1300-C1309

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.4.C1300

关键词

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; synaptic proteins; messenger ribonucleic acid stability; ribonucleic acid-binding proteins; neuromuscular junction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to showing differences in the levels of contractile proteins and metabolic enzymes, fast and slow muscles also differ in their expression profile of structural and synaptic proteins. Because utrophin is a structural protein expressed at the neuromuscular junction, we hypothesize that its expression may be different between fast and slow muscles. Western blots showed that, compared with fast extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles, slow soleus muscles contain significantly more utrophin. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that this difference is accompanied by a parallel increase in the expression of utrophin transcripts. Interestingly, the higher levels of utrophin and its mRNA appear to occur in extrasynaptic regions of muscle fibers as shown by immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization experiments. Furthermore, nuclear run-on assays showed that the rate of transcription of the utrophin gene was nearly identical between EDL and soleus muscles, indicating that increased mRNA stability accounts for the higher levels of utrophin in slow muscles. Direct plasmid injections of reporter gene constructs showed that cis-acting elements contained within the utrophin 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) confer greater stability to chimeric LacZ transcripts in soleus muscles. Finally, we observed a clear difference between EDL and soleus muscles in the abundance of RNA-binding proteins interacting with the utrophin 3'-UTR. Together, these findings highlight the contribution of posttranscriptional events in regulating the expression of utrophin in muscle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据