4.7 Article

Interleukin-7 and infection itself by human immunodeficiency virus 1 favor virus persistence in mature CD4+CD8-CD3+ thymocytes through sustained induction of Bcl-2

期刊

BLOOD
卷 98, 期 7, 页码 2166-2174

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V98.7.2166

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sequence of events and the mechanisms leading to the destruction of the thymus during human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are still poorly characterized. Investigated here are the survival capacity on HIV-1 Infection of the mature single-positive CD4(+)CD8(-)CD3(+) (SP CD4(+)) and the intermediate CD4(+) CD8(-)CD3(-) thymocytes previously shown to be able to replicate the virus in the thymic microenvironment. It is demonstrated that the mature SP CD4(+) thymocytes exhibit a high survival capacity despite the production of a high yield of viruses. Interleukin-7, reported to be a crucial cofactor of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to promote HIV replication, is shown here to counteract the apoptotic activity of TNF. Resistance to apoptosis of SP CD4(+) cells is conferred by a high expression of the IL-7 receptor (IL-7R) associated with the capacity of IL-7 to permanently up-regulate Bcl-2. In addition, this high Bcl-2 level is further enhanced by infection Itself. In contrast, intermediate thymocytes, which replicate the virus at a lower level, are more sensitive to apoptosis, and their differentiation into double-positive CD4(+)CD8(+)CD3(-) (DP CD3(-)) cells strongly increases their death rate on infection. This sensitivity is related to a lower expression of IL-7R and Bcl-2 in intermediate thymocytes, which further decreases at the DIP CD3(-) stage. In addition, a decreased level of Bcl-2 is observed in this subset during infection. Altogether these data suggest that in vivo, HIV infection might create a persistent virus reservoir within the SP CD4(+) thymocytes, whereas the later infection of Intermediate cells might lead to thymopoiesis failure. (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据