4.7 Article

Expression of P-glycoprotein in the gills of oysters, Crassostrea virginica:: seasonal and pollutant related effects

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 54, 期 3-4, 页码 195-204

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00151-5

关键词

Crassostrea virginica; oyster; p-glycoprotein; protein biomarker; seasonal variation; total protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of p-glycoprotein (p-gp) in aquatic organisms has been proposed as a biomarker of pollution exposure. Previous research has provided evidence that p-gp is inducible by organic xenobiotics and that p-gp is overexpressed in mussels from degraded areas. However, seasonal changes in expression at polluted sites has not been described previously. The purposes of these studies were to evaluate the expression of p-gp in polluted and unpolluted sites in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and to determine if there were seasonal differences. P-gp expression and total protein concentrations were measured seasonally in the gills of southeastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, at degraded and undegraded sites in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, USA. At all sites, p-gp expression was generally higher during the warmer months and lower in the colder months. Polluted sites tended to show a decrease in p-gp expression in June and September, suggesting that p-gp inhibition may have occurred. P-gp expression was not significantly related to specific classes of sediment contaminants or to overall sediment contaminant loading. Total gill protein concentrations at all sites were lower during the warmer months and higher during the colder months. In general, all sites tended to show decreased total gill protein concentrations when compared to the control site. Total protein concentrations were significantly related to water temperature, specific classes of sediment contaminants and overall sediment contaminant loads, but there was no relationship with salinity. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据