4.6 Article

Evolving strategies and improving outcomes of the modified Norwood procedure: A 10-year single-institution experience

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 1349-1353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02795-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This study reviews our 10-year experience with the modified Norwood procedure to determine its early and midterm outcomes. The focus is on the impact of evolving management strategies and accumulated institutional experience. Methods. A modified Norwood operation was performed in 171 infants over a 10-year period. Sixty-eight percent of the infants were male, the median age at operation was 6 days (range 1 to 175 days), and the median weight was 3.3 kg (range 1.7 to 4.8 kg). The 10-year period was divided into three eras: era I, 1990 through 1993; era II, 1994 through 1997; and era III; 1998 into 2000. Outcomes and risk factors for mortality were sought. Results. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome or a variant was the primary diagnosis in 118 infants (69%). The overall 5-year survival rate was 43%. Multivariate analysis revealed that only need of preoperative ventilatory support, earlier date of operation, and lower weight at operation were significant independent predictors of increased time-related mortality. Morphologic features such as a diagnosis other than hypoplastic left heart syndrome, ascending aortic size, and noncardiac anomalies were not significantly associated with an increased risk of death. The hospital survival rate for stage-one palliation in era III was 82%, significantly better than that in the preceding eras (p < 0.001). Attrition between stages one and two accounted for a 15% mortality rate among hospital survivors. Conclusions. With increasing experience and improvements in perioperative care and surgical technique, good outcomes can be expected for the first-stage modified Norwood procedure. Greater monitoring of patients in the interstage period may reduce interval mortality and improve overall survival. (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据