4.7 Article

Synergistic μ-opioid and 5-HT1A presynaptic inhibition of GABA release in rat periaqueductal gray neurons

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 529-538

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00100-9

关键词

antinociception; periaqueductal gray; GABA transmission; opioid; serotonin and presynaptic modulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The periaqueductal gray (PAG) plays a critical role in descending antinociception. In mechanically dissociated rat PAG neurons, pharmacologically separated spontaneous GABAergic miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were recorded using the nystatin-perforated patch technique. Both DAMGO, a specific mu -opioid receptor agonist, and serotonin inhibited mIPSC frequency in a dose-dependent manner without affecting mIPSC amplitude, respectively, in the same PAG neurons. The presynaptic opioid effect was blocked by a specific mu -opioid receptor antagonist, CTOP. The presynaptic serotonergic effect was mimicked by a specific 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, and blocked by the specific antagonist, NAN-190. These opioidergic and serotonergic inhibitions of GABA release employed the similar intracellular mechanism of opening 4-AP-sensitive K+ channels via GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins). Subthreshold concentrations of DAMGO (3 nM) significantly decreased mIPSC frequency with subthreshold concentrations of serotonin (3 nM) and this effect was completely blocked by pretreatment with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), a PTX-sensitive G-protein inhibitor. In contrast, maximum doses of DAMGO (10 muM) did not further inhibit mIPSC frequency with maximum doses of serotonin (10 muM). In conclusion, activation of presynaptic L-opioid and 5-HT1A receptors synergistically inhibited GABA release. These results suggest a cellular mechanism within PAG for the analgesic effectiveness of combined therapies using opioids in conjunction with classes of anti-depressants which increase synaptic serotonin levels. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All fights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据