3.8 Article

Response of human CD34+ cells to CXC, CC, and CX3C chemokines:: Implications for cell migration and activation

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/152581601753193850

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrastructural studies of marrow and examination of the in vivo processes of stem cell homing and mobilization show that multipotential hematopoietic progenitors are able to traverse endothelial cells. The regulation of this process by various classes of chemokines was studied in this report, using an in vitro model of transendothelial migration. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HU-VECs) or bone marrow-derived endothelial cells (BMECs) were grown to confluence on 3-mum microporous membrane inserts and placed in 24-well culture plates. CD34(+) cells isolated from normal volunteer donor marrow by immunoadsorption or magnetic bead selection techniques were added to the inserts and various individual chemokines were added to the lower chamber of the culture plates in serum-free conditions. After 24 h, the percentage of transmigrated cells was determined. A mean of 8.5% of unfractionated marrow CD34(+) populations migrated, and all chemokines tested, with the exception of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha), had some positive effect on this migration. The greatest effects were seen with stroma-derived factor-1 alpha (SDF-1 alpha) and stroma-derived factor-1 beta (SDF-1 beta), with lesser effects noted for other chemokines and cytokines. When the CD34(+) population was subselected for expression of CD38, a greater fraction of the CD38(-) cells migrated as compared to the CD38(+) fraction. CD34(+) cells isolated from mobilized peripheral blood and cord blood also migrated in response to chemokines. Chemokines of the CC, CXC, and CX3C classes as well as other hematopoietic cytokines may modulate the process of stem cell transmigration of endothelial cells. Further understanding of this process may help elucidate the mechanism of stem cell mobilization and homing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据