4.7 Article

Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: A FRISC II substudy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01501-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to elucidate possible mechanisms for the prognostic value of troponin T (tnT). BACKGROUND The reasons for the adverse prognosis associated with elevation of troponins in unstable coronary artery disease are poorly understood. METHODS Patients enrolled in the Fast Revascularization during InStability in CAD (FRISC-II) trial were included. Clinical characteristics, findings at echo cardiography and coronary angiography, and prognosis were evaluated in relation to different tnT levels. RESULTS Absence of significant coronary stenosis was more frequent and three-vessel disease or left main stem stenosis was less frequent in patients without, compared with, detectable tnT. The occurrence of visible thrombus increased with rising levels of tnT. In the group with the highest levels of tnT, occlusion of the left circumflex artery was more common than in the three other tnT groups, as was a left ventricular ejection fraction below 0.45. The one-year risk of death in the noninvasive arm of the study increased by increasing levels of tnT (1.6% to 4.6%), whereas the risk of myocardial infarction showed an inverted U-shaped curve and was lower in the lowest (5.5%) and highest (8.4%) tnT groups than in the two intermediate groups (17.5% and 16.2%). CONCLUSIONS Any detectable elevation of tnT raises the,probability of significant coronary stenosis and thrombus formation and is associated with an increased risk of reinfarction and death. However, at a more pronounced elevation of troponin, a higher proportion of patients has a persistent occlusion of the culprit vessel and reduced left ventricular function, associated with a high mortality but a modest risk of reinfarction. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据