4.7 Article

TRAIL-induced eradication of primary tumour cells from multiple myeloma patient bone marrows is not related to TRAIL receptor expression or prior chemotherapy

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 1650-1657

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402251

关键词

multiple myeloma; TRAIL; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) shares significant homology with CD95 (Fas) ligand and has the ability to induce apoptosis in sensitive cells through a caspase-mediated pathway. We have evaluated the activity of purified human recombinant soluble TRAIL (S-TRAIL, comprising residues 114-281; Blomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA) and a leucine zipper construct of TRAIL (LZ-TRAIL; Immunex, Seattle WA, USA) against myeloma cell lines NCI H929, U266, RPMI 8226, the FasL-sensitive Jurkat T cell ALL line, the lymphoblastoid cell line MC/CAR and primary tumour cells from 16 myeloma patients. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between TRAIL-induced apoptosis and TRAIL receptor expression utilising RT-PCR and flow cytometry. Two of three myeloma cell lines and Jurkat were TRAIL sensitive whereas MC/CAR was relatively resistant. Five of 16 (31%) primary tumours demonstrated greater than or equal to 20% reduction in myeloma cells following TRAIL incubation (20-59%). This did not correlate with prior therapy. Four cell lines (two sensitive) and five primary tumours (two sensitive) demonstrated mRNA expression of the intra-cellular death domain containing TRAIL-R1. Variable expression of the two decoy (TRAIL-R3 and R4) and soluble (osteoprotegerin) receptors was seen and this did not correlate with TRAIL resistance. We conclude that myeloma cell expression of death effector receptors for TRAIL is insufficient to confer sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis but that in a significant minority of patients, irrespective of prior therapy, tumour cells are sensitive to TRAIL. The further investigation of TRAIL as an adjunct to presently available therapies for myeloma is justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据