4.5 Article

Impact of Transcendental Meditation® on cardiovascular function at rest and during acute stress in adolescents with high normal blood pressure

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 597-605

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00261-6

关键词

Transcendental Meditation; blood pressure; stress response; adolescents; cardiovascular reactivity

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL062976-04, R01 HL062976-03, R01 HL062976-02, HL62976, R01 HL062976-01, R01 HL062976-01S1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH062976] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study examined the impact of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) program on cardiovascular (CV) reactivity in adolescents with high normal blood pressure (BP). Method: Thirty-five adolescents [34 African Americans (AAs), I Caucasian American (CA); ages 15-18 years] with resting systolic blood pressure (SEP) between the 85th and 95th percentile for their age and gender on three consecutive occasions, were randomly assigned to either TM (n = 17) or health education control (CTL, n = 18) groups. The TM group engaged in 15-min meditation twice each day for 2 months including sessions during school lunch break. Primary CV outcome measures were changes in BP, heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO) at rest and in response to two laboratory stressors, a simulated car driving stressor and an interpersonal social stressor interview. Results: The TM group exhibited greater decreases in resting SBP (P < .03) from pre- to postintervention, compared to the CTL group. The TM group exhibited greater decreases from pre- to postintervention in SBP, HR, and CO reactivity (P's < .03) to the simulated car driving stressor, and in SBP reactivity (P < .03) to the social stressor interview. Conclusion: The TM program appears to have a beneficial impact upon CV functioning at rest and during acute laboratory stress in adolescents at-risk for hypertension. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据