Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness

Purpose. To determine the central corneal thickness values in healthy eyes with the recently developed Orbscan scanning-slit system, contact and noncontact specular microscopic pachymetry and compare the results to conventional ultrasonic pachymetry. Methods. In the following sequence, Orbscan, Topcon SP-2000P noncontact specular microscope, AL-1000 ultrasound, and Tomey contact specular microscope were used to record thickness values. Thirty-four healthy right corneas of 34 healthy subjects were investigated. Results. Orbscan pachymetry correlated significantly with ultrasound (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), contact (r = 0.45, p < 0.001), and noncontact specular microscopy (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Likewise, the Topcon SP-2000P noncontact specular microscopy pachymetry disclosed similar statistical results compared with ultrasound (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), and contact specular microscopy pachymetry (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). The mean central corneal thickness results were significantly higher (p less than or equal to 0.01) than ultrasonic values (580 +/- 43 mum) using the contact specular microscope (640 +/- 43 mum) or Orbscan system (602 +/- 59 mum) but were significantly, lower (p < 0.001) using the noncontact specular microscope (547 +/- 49 mum). Conclusions. The results indicate that the devices tested cannot be simply used interchangeably. For long-term patient follow-up, one specific instrument is recommended. Recently developed pachymetry machines are especially helpful when additional corneal data such as thickness profile, elevation maps, anterior chamber depth, and endothelial morphology are required.