4.7 Article

Is childhood-onset Type I diabetes a wealth-related disease?: An ecological analysis of European incidence rates

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 B9-B16

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/PL00002961

关键词

type I diabetes mellitus; epidemiology; geographical variation; incidence; risk factors; ecological analysis; gross domestic product

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. To describe the epidemiology of childhood-onset Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Europe, the EURODIAB collaborative group established prospective, geographically-defined registers of children diagnosed under 15 years of age. A total of 16362 cases were registered by 44 centres during the period 1989-1994. The registers cover a population of approximately 28 million children with most European countries represented. Methods. In most centres a primary and a secondary source of ascertainment were used so that the completeness of registration could be assessed by the capture-recapture method. Ecological correlation and regression analyses were used to study the relationship between incidence and various environmental, health and economic indicators. Results. The standardised average annual incidence rate during the period 1989-94 ranged from 3.2 cases per 100 000 person-years in the Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia to 40.2 cases per 100 000 person-years in Finland. Indicators of national prosperity such as infant mortality (r = -0.64) and gross domestic product (r = 0.58) were most strongly and significantly correlated with incidence rate and previously-reported associations with milk consumption (r = 0.58), coffee consumption (r = 0.51) and latitude (r = 0.40) were also observed. Conclusion/interpretation. The wide variation in childhood Type I diabetes incidence rates within Europe could be partially explained by indicators of national prosperity. These indicators could reflect differences in environmental risk factors such as nutrition or lifestyle that are important in determining a country's incidence rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据