4.8 Article

Monitoring of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides in the water of the Reconquista river (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 14, 页码 3457-3461

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00058-6

关键词

pesticides; organochlorines; organophosphates; monitoring; urban watercourse; Reconquista river; Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Reconquista river is a typical example of the adverse impact of human activity on a watercourse. Approximately 10% of the population of the country is settled on its basin,and it receives wastewater discharges from residences and industries. This paper describes the results of the first systematic data for measurement of pesticides in surface water of the river, based on a monthly monitoring program over two-year span. The analyses were performed, in three sampling stations (S-1, S-2 and S-3), along 46 km of its course, following the AOAC methods. Screening included the following pesticides: (a) Organochlorines: alpha, beta and gamma HCH; heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide; aldrin; endrin; dieldrin; op' and pp' DDT; op' and pp' DDE; alpha and gamma chlordane and endosulphan II; (b) Organophosphates: ethyl and methyl parathion; chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion. From the 60 samples analyzed, 35% contained organochlorine pesticides in a concentration higher than the detection limit. Organophosphates were found in no case. Throughout the studied period, DDT and its metabolite DDE were only found in S-1 and gamma chlordane in S-3; heptachlor was present in 50% of the samples Of S-2 and in 35% Of S-3, while HCH isomers were detected in 38% Of S-2 and 45% of S-3 samples. Neither temporal nor spatial trends were found. There was not a relationship between the time of samplings and the fumigation season for farming purposes, At all locations, pesticides levels were found to be between 40 and 400 times higher than the legal limits established for protection of aquatic life. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据