4.7 Article

A nonlinear dynamic simulation model for xenobiotic transport and whole plant allocation following foliar application. III. Influence of chemical properties, plant characteristics, and environmental parameters on xenobiotic absorption and translocation

期刊

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 77-87

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/pest.2001.2558

关键词

computer simulation; model; allocation; foliar-applied xenobiotics; cuticular penetration; phloem translocation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computer simulation modeling studies were conducted to examine the influence of xenobiotic chemical properties, plant characteristics, and environmental parameters in determining xenobiotic absorption and translocation. When the effect of the partition coefficient for a xenobiotic was examined it was found that absorption increased as the partition coefficient increased from -5 to 5. On the other hand, xenobiotic translocation from the site of application first increased when the partition coefficient increased from -5 to 2 and then declined with any subsequent increases in the partition coefficient. For xenobiotic compounds considered hydrophilic (log K-ow = -2.0), intermediate (log K-ow = 2.0), or hydrophobic (log K-ow = 4.0), variation in the acid dissociation constant (pK(a)) from 2 to 10 yielded a complex pattern for an effect upon translocation. Whereas it was found that xenobiotic absorption deceased as the molar volume and thickness of the leaf cuticle increased, both xenobiotic absorption and translocation increased as the relative humidity and air temperature increased. Increases in phloem sap velocity and transpiration rate were also found to increase xenobiotic translocation rates. These results are discussed in terms of interactions between chemical parameters for the xenobiotic, characteristics of the plant, and influence of environmental parameters on xenobiotic absorption and translocation processes. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据