4.4 Article

Mice lacking CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-α show hyperproliferation of alveolar type II cells and increased surfactant protein mRNAs

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 306, 期 1, 页码 57-63

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004410100420

关键词

alveolar type II cells; gene regulation; in situ hybridization; lung injury; wound healing; mutant mice (C/EBP alpha-deficient)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lung-specific surfactant proteins (SP) are essential for normal respiratory function. Transcription factors may play an important role in the regulation of surfactant proteins. The CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family consists of transcription factors that can stimulate expression of genes in lipid-metabolizing epithelial cells. C/EBP alpha -deficient mice have been shown to exhibit abnormal pulmonary histopathology. Recently, we demonstrated that C/EBP family members are differentially expressed in alveolar type II cell proliferation and in pulmonary fibrosis. In the present study, to investigate whether the C/EBP family would be involved in the regulation of surfactant proteins, we examined the protein expression of SP-A, and SP-C, and mRNA expression of SP-A, SP-B, and SP-C in the lungs from newborn C/EBP alpha -deficient mice. Using immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated that positive cells for SP-C, specific to alveolar type II cells, in the lungs were more abundant in the newborn C/EBP alpha -deficient mice than in control mice, which suggests the hyperproliferation of alveolar type II cells in the lungs of the C/EBP alpha -deficient mice. In situ hybridization analysis revealed that expression of SP-A, SP-B, and SP-C mRNAs were increased in the lungs of newborn C/EBP alpha -deficient mice. Northern blot analysis revealed that surfactant protein mRNAs were also increased. Thus, these results suggest that C/EBP alpha may play a key role in the proliferation of alveolar type II cells and the regulation of genes of surfactant protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据