4.4 Article

Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 630-634

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/501834

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and control a biphasic outbreak of Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). DESIGN: Epidemiological and laboratory investigation of the outbreak. SETTING: The NICU of the 1,470-bed teaching hospital of the University Federico II, Naples, Italy. PATIENTS: The outbreak involved 56 cases of colonization by S marcescens over a 15-month period, with two epidemic peaks of 6 and 3 months, respectively. Fourteen (25%) of the 56 colonized infants developed clinical infections, 50% of which were major (sepsis, meningitis, or pneumonia). METHODS: Epidemiological and microbiological investigations, analysis of macrorestriction pattern of genomic DNA through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of clinical and environmental isolates, and institution of infection control measures. by PFGE demonstrated that the vast majority of S marcescens isolates, including three environmental strains isolated from two handwashing disinfectants and the hands of a nurse, were of the same clonal type. The successful control of the outbreak was achieved through cohorting of noncolonized infants, isolation of S marcescens-infected and -colonized infants, and an intense educational program that emphasized the need for adherence to glove use and handwashing policies. The NICU remained open to new admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Outbreaks caused by S marcescens are very difficult to eradicate. An infection control program that includes molecular typing of microorganisms and the proper dissemination among staff members of the typing results is likely to be very effective in reducing NICU-acquired infections and in controlling outbreaks caused by S marcescens, as well as other multiresistant bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据