4.7 Article

Migratory properties of naive, effector, and memory CD8+ T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 194, 期 7, 页码 953-966

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.194.7.953

关键词

lymphocyte homing; lymph node; chemokines; adhesion molecules; inflammation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56949, HL54936, HL48675] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been proposed that two different antigen-experienced T cell subsets may be distinguishable by their preferential ability to home to lymphoid organs (central memory cells) or non-lymphoid tissues (effector memory/effector cells). We have shown recently that murine antigen-primed CD8(+) T cells cultured in interleukin (IL)-15 (CD8(IL-15)) resemble central memory cells in phenotype and function. In contrast, primed CD8(+) T cells cultured in IL-2 (CD8(IL-2)) become cytotoxic effector cells. Here, the migratory behavior of these two subsets was investigated. Naive, CD8(IL-15) cells and, to a lesser degree, CD8(IL-2) cells localized to T cell areas in the but only naive and CD8(IL-15) cells horned to lymph nodes (LNs) and Peyer's patches. Intravital microscopy of peripheral LNs revealed that CD8(IL-15) cells, but not CD8(IL-2) cells, rolled and arrested in high endothelial venules (HEVs). Migration of CD8(IL-15) cells to LNs depended on L-selectin and required chemokines that bind CC chemokine receptor (CCR)7. Both antigen-experienced populations, but not naive T cells, responded to inflammatory chemokines and accumulated at sites of inflammation. However, CD8(IL-2) cells were 12 times more efficient in migrating to inflamed peritoneum than CD8(IL-15) cells. Furthermore, CD8(IL-15) cells proliferated rapidly upon reencounter with antigen at sites of inflammation. Thus, central memory-like CD8(IL-15) cells home avidly to lymphoid organs and moderately to sites of inflammation, where they mediate rapid recall responses, whereas CD8(IL-2) effector T cells accumulate in inflamed tissues, but are excluded from most lymphoid organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据