4.5 Letter

Complications of lumbar drainage after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 623-627

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.117334

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Paraplegia remains a frequent complication of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Many adjunct therapies have been developed to address this complication. Lumbar drainage is frequently used in an attempt to decrease intrathecal pressure and improve intramedullary perfusion pressure. The effectiveness of this therapy is unclear, and the complications of lumbar drainage used for this indication are unknown. We present a case of intraspinal hematoma with significant neurologic deficit after TAAA repair and review the associated complications of lumbar drains placed for TAAA. Methods. The charts of all patients undergoing operations for TAAA repair were reviewed. Patients who underwent perioperative placement of a lumbar drain were included regardless of aneurysm type or etiology. Demographics, Crawford grade, and perioperative parameters and complications were reviewed. Results. Sixty-five patients underwent TAAA repair with 62 (95%) receiving a preoperative lumbar drain. There were two (3.2%) intraspinal hemorrhagic complications, including one patient with a poor neurologic outcome. No infections or other complications directly related to drainage were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate a significant association between lumbar drain complications and perioperative and intraoperative parameters such as blood loss or hypotension, level of drain placement, and Crawford grade. Conclusions. Lumbar drainage is a frequent adjunct to TAAA repair. However, placement of the drain itself can be associated with significant complications whose aggravating factors may be unidentifiable. Complications resulting from lumbar drainage should be considered in any patient who has postoperative lower extremity neurologic deficits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据