4.3 Article

Detection of transgene in progeny at different developmental stages following testis-mediated gene transfer

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 196-201

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1077

关键词

gene transfer; sperm vector; testis; liposome; EGFP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We recently reported that exogenous DNA injected into testis as a liposome complex can be transferred into the egg via sperm by natural mating and integrated in the genome (testis-mediated gene transfer: TMGT). Here, we studied the efficiency of each of the several liposomes in associating foreign DNA with sperm, the expression of an introduced gene in early embryos, and the presence of the DNA in fetuses and pups at different ages. The CMV/beta -actin/ EGFP fusion gene, encapsulated with different liposomes, was injected into rat testis, and spermatozoa in the cauda epididymis were obtained 1, 4, and 14 days after injection. We tested each of the 8 liposomes, and found that only 2, DMRIE-C and SuperFect, led to the detection of foreign DNA on all of the days examined, with relatively higher ratios of rats having positive sperm. By means of TMGT using either of those two liposomes, more than 80% of morula-stage embryos expressed EGFP, as observed by fluorescence microscopy. Then we detected introduced DNA in the progeny by PCR and Southern dot blot, and found that the ratio of animals carrying the foreign DNA decreased as they developed, and that only a part of postpartum progeny were foreign-DNA-positive with high incidence of mosaicism. These results suggest that, although, the success rate is still limited, foreign DNA could be integrated into the genome of the progeny by TMGT at least under specific experimental conditions, the efficiency of which depends largely on the characteristics of the liposome. The results also suggest that TMGT could be applicable to fetal gene therapy as well as to the generation of transgenic animals. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 60: 196-201, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据