4.6 Article

The complex II inhibitor atpenin A5 protects against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury via activation of mitochondrial KATP channels

期刊

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 121-129

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-009-0001-y

关键词

Preconditioning; Ischemia; Reperfusion; Mitochondrial ATP sensitive potassium channel; Diazoxide; 5HD

资金

  1. American Heart Association pre-doctoral fellowship
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1-HL071158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) can be mimicked or blocked by pharmacologic agents, which modulate the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mK(ATP)) channel, thereby implicating this channel in the mechanism of IPC. Cardioprotection can also be achieved via inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory complex II, and significant pharmacologic overlap exists between complex II inhibitors and mK(ATP) channel agonists. However, the relationship between complex II and the mK(ATP) channel remains unclear. Atpenin A5 (AA5) is a potent and specific complex II inhibitor, and herein we report that AA5 (1 nM) also activates the mK(ATP) channel and protects against simulated ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in isolated cardiomyocytes. Similar to known mK(ATP) agonists, AA5-mediated protection was sensitive to the mK(ATP) antagonists 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD) and glyburide. Notably, the optimal mK(ATP) opening and protective concentration of AA5 had no effect on complex II enzymatic activity, suggesting an interaction of AA5 with complex II, but not inhibition of the complex per se, is necessary for protection. A cardioprotective effect of AA5 was also observed in isolated perfused hearts, wherein AA5 increased post-IR contractile function and decreased infarct size, in a 5HD-sensitive manner. In conclusion, the specific complex II inhibitor AA5 is the most potent mK(ATP) activator discovered to date, and provides a novel method of activating mK(ATP) channels and protecting the heart from IR injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据