4.6 Article

Humoral anti-proteasomal autoimmunity in dilated cardiomyopathy

期刊

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 9-18

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-009-0061-z

关键词

Viral heart disease; Proteasome; Cardiomyopathy; Autoimmunity

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB/TR 19 TP B3, SFB/TR 19 TP C2]
  2. DFG [FE 470/3-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Virus-induced chronic inflammation, autoimmune processes and impaired protein quality control may be involved in the pathogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The ubiquitin-proteasome system is important in the modulation of inflammatory processes and the immune response. Proteasomes were identified as targets of a humoral autoimmune response in systemic inflammatory diseases, which provoked us to investigate anti-proteasomal immunity in DCM in detail: a total of 90 DCM patients with impaired left-ventricular function (LVEF a parts per thousand currency sign 45%) were enrolled in this study. Autoimmune response to cardiac proteasomes was found to be enhanced in DCM patients, revealing the detection of predominantly alpha subunits of the 20S proteasome complex. Proteasome antibody (ProtAb) levels were found to be particularly enhanced at stages of advanced heart failure: moderately decreased LVEF and considerably increased NT-pro BNP levels were observed in DCM patients who tested positive for ProtAb (P < 0.05). A linear regression model suggested a link between the detection of cardiotropic viruses in endomyocardial biopsies and anti-proteasomal immunity (P < 0.01). Likewise, ProtAb levels were enhanced in a murine model of chronic enterovirus myocarditis. Our data also point to a potential interaction of ProtAb with the cell surface: ProtAb exerted negative inotropic effects in field-stimulated cardiomyocytes. In conclusion, humoral autoreactive anti-proteasome immune responses appear to be enhanced in DCM. Viral infection of the myocardium may be linked to the induction of anti-proteasomal immunity in DCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据